Back to Politics - world4ch BBS

im a pedophile

>>1
>>2
>>3
i know 3 now

This forum is for serious political debate (not current events).

I would say this is a stupid question since 99% percent of pedophiles don't talk about it in public.

pedo should be legal.

>>10
ohh i love kids ass... too

>>13
if so, why are there so many pedophiles?  you wouldnt see a thing that might lead you to pedophilia, unless you SEEKED it.

failed romance leads to pedophilia, me thinks.

Pedophiles just made up their sexual preference, just like homosexuals. Theres no way a sane person can fap to kids (microgenitallia that is of little use to adults) or members of the same sex (genitallia that doesn't even fit your own). I don't think people are really gay or pedo, but they feel they are and act on it. By pedo, I mean attracted to kids 12 and under (or pre/early puberty). 15 and older girls look the same until mid 20's, so if you have sex with a 16 y/o a pedo you are not, pervert maybe.

>>18
Pedophiles just made up their sexual preference, just like homosexuals.
I would bet $200 you do not know anyone openly gay.

>>17
Studies indicate that 20% of American men have some paedophilic tendencies, and roughly 7% would honestly rape a child if there were no consequences (e.g. on a desert island). The figure is more like 2% in women, though.
Source: http://www.glgarden.org/desire/population.html

Not his job to make sense.  Talking from your ass provides alot of freedom.

>>20
Can we define our terms?  When you say "pedophilic tendencies," do you mean these men are saying "yeah, I'd bone a 17 year old girl if I wouldn't get caught," or do you mean they're lusting for seven-year-olds?

I'm not disagreeing with you.  I'm trying to understand what you mean.  Define "tendencies."  Define "rape."  Define "child."  Help me understand your position.  Thanks.

>>25

Thats a really long post there... It'd be even better if it actually said something.

>>27

You're kind of dumb.

>>27
Could you really become sexual aroused & erect in a sexual situation with a man and reach orgasm just to try to be cool?  Or would it be impossible for you to find it arousing?  If you couldn't do it, what reason do you have to assume that anybody else would be able to?

>>31
I think this supports the "1 in 5" theory, actually

It's VIP QUALITY!

>>31
Korean was a part of Japanese in WWII.

>>37
Korea and Taiwan weren't same as Manchuria which had been, indeed, occupied by Japan.

So Korean soldiers can be found with Japanese ones in a Chinese propaganda.
http://japanese.joins.com/transboard/upfile/up28088.jpg

Sexual attraction to breasts is instinctive. Breasts are one indicator of fertility. Needless to say, as a species it's in our intrest for the males to be busy fucking healthy fertile females.

Don't go blabbing about something you so obviously don't get.

>>40 That would be assuming that breasts size was designed to indicate health and fertility, and assuming that people are instinctively attracted to large breasts. That is not always the case.

Hooray for BQQBIES!

sage

btw, no party supports pedos (nambla political wing maybe?), I don't think this is politics.

sorry there is no Philosophy forum right now, you can talk philosophy in here all you want

>>50
Must be one nasty caricature of a Philosophy forum you have planned there...

This shit belongs in VIP.

It's not revolting. It's just plain asinine. Read the comments man.

WTF does pedophilia have to do with politics anyway? It's generally some older guy getting a hardon over some titless brats.

>>50

i don't think pedo is a philosophy either (catholicism?) . Maybe psychology board would be appropriate. This board should be renamed to "PHILOSOPHY+THEOLOGY+PSYCHOLOGY+SOCIOLOGY+POLITICS" then.

I was watching something about the Pornography industry on HBO the other day. The Europeans think that the American male's fetish of liking large breasts is a side effect of our infantilization.

One porn actress said, and I paraphrase: "It's a very good thing that we have pornography, otherwise we would be a bunch of "mother fuckers".

I guess this post could also belong to a thread dealing with Freudianism.

>>59

I have to disagree, sort of. With everyone, including the Europeans. I'm going to try to figure this convoluted subject out, I could be wrong about all of this, but here it is:

I think we are hard-wired with a natural aversion to our mothers and immediate family members. We don't have an idealization of them, we have an "aversion" to them. Would you want to have sex with someone that even looked like your mother?

Freud also said that when males prefer females who are physically larger than they are that these males must have more than natural feelings for their mother. If the guy was not outright making things up, I don't think he had a good understanding of this issue.. I think it's possible that he or a subject of his had an aversion to his mother that disturbed him in some sense that carried over to his ideation of sex with women and Freud found all of this to be a very common psychological phenomenon, and he took that knowledge and coupled it with child psychology and tried to apply it to adults by exploiting all of that knowledge into pseudo-scientifical sophistry (that is, if he indeed does apply it to adults, I don't have a good understanding of his work. Maybe it's other people exploiting Freuds ideas?)..

It probably wouldn't be too hard to exploit, for control, the naivety of some fellow who lacked understanding of himself and who also happened to have strong sexual aversions to his mother, maybe feeling the idea of the mother invading some private space of his sexual being in some instances. Someone sophisticated enough could cause such a person to think that, in reality, they wanted to have sex with their mother.

Maybe the gravitation to the opposite(if "opposite" is not arbitrary), to pedophilia, is a natural gravitation away from the aversion and to physiological purity, only there is one problem with that: it's clearly antisocial to act on your pedophilic lust.

Antisocial personality disorder is having a lack of compassion for others. Seeing a weakness in others and wanting to exploit it for your own gain shows a lack of conscience--this is the gist of antisocial behavior.

The idea that most pedophiles resist following through with their instinctive lust and decide not to act on it due to the harm it would cause the object of their affection is also very popular and makes much sense to me.

Basically, what I would like to say is that when pedophiles are not antisocial they will not violate children, and if they do violate children, possibly while rationalizing that the child isn't being harmed, they are violating the child, and themselves as well. If it were carried out within a culture such as ours it could also harm other pedophiles, and society itself.

As for the issue of incest, it's easier for a me to look at bisexually (here, this word is not meant in a sexual orientation/preference sense but as incest applies to both sexes, whereas the whole pedophile thing is easier for me to understand from the male POV). Whether it be a son and his mother or a daughter and her father, for it to occur and not cause a major psychological disturbance in the son or daughter, that individual would have to completely lack the aversion, and probably have to be psychologically disordered in a way that makes them view their mother/father as something other than a mother/father, if that is possible, and/or in an extreme and odd case of antisocial personality, simply as an "object".

Even for someone to be erotically stimulated by the thought of having sex with their mother, father, etc. would be a sign of psychological disorder unless it's not recurrent and happens while they are in a dream-state or something of that nature. If one is not antisocial, can think efficiently (i.e they are not retarted), the odds of them having Oedipal Syndrome (if that means someone who wants to bang his mother) or "oedipette syndrome", for that matter, would have to be nearly impossible. How this applies to Freudianism, I don't know. I would have to research it.

Sorry if some of that has poor grammar. I'm not an expert at it and I didn't want to set here for a long period of time trying to correct and simplify it.

Oh, and if it matters for the reader, I do have some pedophile tendencies. However, my strong attraction to females is not limited or primarily focused at young females. In fact, many people, of any age level and especially under 14, succeed at being "not my type". I cannot be attracted to a girl just because she's young and innocent so I'll have to disagree with whoever posted something about how pedophiles only want to infect innocence. or whatever it was. 

I do agree that this doesn't really fit into a politics category. Maybe Science would have been more appropriate.

>>60
commenting on freud

if you subscribe to freud, seeking out your anti-mother in a sexual partner is the repressive manifestation of the infantilized id

meaning it actually wants something visually akin to your mother subconsciously, in the part of mind that cannot be rationalized

race is another spectrum on which to slide
besides the age spectrum....

many asian fetishes from anglo race perspectives are created out of perceptions of submissiveness and far-removed cultural exoticness, in that many of these individuals have issues dealing with women of their own race as equals for whatever reason

other races are an easy way to achieve the conscious "aversion" you are referring to, what goes on in the id is separate from conscious action

as far as the age spectrum goes... generally it is kept within reason, the 25year old wife of the 80year old oil tycoon et al

though youth has always been lusted after, there has always been reasonable moral restraint based on maturity considerations

harming a child is abjectly wrong as is all actual pedophelia, socially or anti-socially

<<62

"actual pedophilia" is not child abuse. It's just an attraction to young girls. Pedophilia and Child Abuse are two different things. "Anti-social" does not mean what it looks like it does; anti-social behavior has nothing to do with being unsocial towards people, it means to use people, exploiting their weakness for your gain, with no empathy for them and thinking that they deserve it because they are weaker.

Correct.

Post 67 is misleading.

The term "pedophile" could be used erroneously to indicate many things, but it is DEFINED indicating something wholly independent of the idea of sexual encounters or lack therof.

pedophile:

Noun
An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children.

child:

Noun
Inflected forms: pl.chil·dren 1. A person between birth and puberty.

In other words, if you ever feel a sexual attraction to a child, you are a pedophile. Even (and I'm sure it's very common among socially adjusted people, contrary to post 67) if you don't prefer them over older people and are very glad not to act on your attraction to a child, you are still a pedophile, poster 65.

Of course if you want to look at the whole language thing as not dependent on definitions and look at it in a constructivist (is that the right term?) point of view, you could say that the term "pedophile" means only what most people in a given environment thinks it does. If that's the case, than it's probably at an in-between kind of existence, and you might want to use the advice of the 67th poster. Regardless, though, you're a pedophile unless it goes completely off course completely, in whichever environment you are in, from its originally intended meaning.

Well, I hope someone learned something by reading my post (as I have learned things from others here), and even though the layout was loading weird tonight and I had to scroll way over to the right to get the thread list, I am starting to like this place. Keep it up.

>>69
Well... how much did you know about sex when you were 11?  Of course, any more than almost nothing makes you a bad example, but we'll still love you.

Even if an 18 year old has sex, or an abortion or uses drugs, much later they may regret it. It seems to me, true adulthood is delayed more and more, especially in the western countries. Nowadays, only 60+ year olds can fully appreciate the choices they make. It takes alot longer than it used to to accumulate the proper amount of wisdom. Maybe when life expectancy was shorter it was more important to learn from your mistakes the first time. The hedonsitic lifestyle does not bring longterm satisfaction, but thanks to viagra it is continuing far too long.

If you are attracted to kids before they have reached sexual maturation, it is a serious problem. When it is a 12 year old with tits it becomes more clouded, yet your brain should know better even if your balls don't.

so you're saying we all should hav secks only if we past our 60's already?

Lolitas are just as likely to have already been through puberty.


"lolita"
Means sexually precocious young girl. In the novel by Nabokov, The main character says that Lolita is a nymphet, and he prefers nymphets to women. He said that nymphets usually lose their "nymphethood" around the age of 14 or shortly later and can be younger than 10, but are usually older.

"Lolicon" doesn't have to be prepubescent. The people on the /l/ board have no idea what they're talking about. You could have "lolita complex" without being a pedophile.

why is it ok for 13 year olds to fuck each other but not ok for an 18 year old to fuck a 13 year old?

i want to be

>>27

By your logic mastubation, having sex with a woman while wearing a condom, having any orgasm at all that doesnt produce children doesnt make sense. Take a "let he who has not sinned cast the first stone" pill and stfu

pedos gtfo

i think you are divorced from reality

>Today we concoct scientific justifications for the belief that sex with children is harmful to them,

dont need to concoct anything, poll children who were abused before they were mature, statistics prove you wrong

again, pedos gtfo

Pædophilia is the result of nurture. Compare the levels of pædophilia in authoritarian nations like Japan (ie extremely high) with levels in less authoritarian nations such as some European nations. Unless you're a white supremacist, the implications are clear.

If pædophilia is genetic, then how do we deal with it? Eugenics? Wonderful idea, we all saw how nice it worked for Hitler and preWWII Amerika. Millions of people sterilized or even killed. Is that something we really want to return?

>>87
Actually, eugenics would work really well with pedophilia.  Supposing that pedophilia were to be 100% genetic, the only reason pedos breed is that they can't get their hands on lolis.  Just have a government-run system of loli distribution for pedos and they won't be able to procreate.  Problem solved :D

fucking pedos

gtfo

I seriously doubt there were magazines on how to seduce your daughter. It sounds like an urban legend to me.

As for the gov-loli idea, keep in mind that the republican party hates both pædophilia and government intervention in the economy. :)

Also, I think the term is nymphet or Lolita, not loli (which appears to be a back formation from lolikon)

>>86

Read >>85 correctly, he said

 "To be sure, forcing anyone into sexual relations is harmful, but to assume that all sex with children is, by nature, forced is so incorrect as to be completely divorced from reality."

And then you mention _abused_ kids? Abuse is harmfull, nomatter what age.

>>94

No, it is true. I saw a documentary on the History channel about it, but it was in scandenavia, esp. denmark where it was happining in the late 60's early 70's. The gov. had to rethink their total legalization of porn and added anti-CP laws.

>>99
Also, this idea could be used to take some pressure off the orphanages and juvenile detention centers and such.  Two birds with one stone, as it were.

And they could institute a Loliclone program.

>>103

Then should we execute all the pædophiles on the spot? In fact, lets just execute all criminals on the spot if their behavior is genetic.

>>104
hey why not.
if we do that, then we'll end up with super-smart criminals and law abiders.
that is not a very good combination

my half a cent, cuz i'm not gonna waste a penny on this.

like 107, if the relationship is between a post-pubecnt child and an adult goes a little more then parental care, it should not be for sexual reasons, from either side. i dun believe that a relationship buit on sex is ever a good idea. a relationship built on love n care is all good no matter the age of either side. because a true relationship should be love of the person, from lust or pleasure, and those who only live for those should be shot too. if ur that selfish, that u wouldn't care what kind of effect u'd have on ur partner, both mentally and physically, then u don't deserve to have someone and should be put to sleep like the dog u are.

i dun believe pedos, like gays, are a bad thing. itz just a pereference, but if u really care bout that person, consider ur actions and their effects.

i mean if they really feel for each other, and they wanta do something like that then by all means, but remember not everyone developes the same, if the person is imature seriously, then no matter the age, itz not a good idea. itz up to the partners to decide when's the best time, and hopefully one if not both will have good judgment (as in maturity). i know relationships where one person is legal but so mentally imature he should be castrated, and i know a girl who's illegal, but so mature she can screw anyone she wants cuz i know she's responsible enough. there are some people in the world that are responsible enough to handle a relationship. for the other's who aren't mature enough, should wait till they're ready, and for those who'd neva mature, should be shot.

continued from >>111

As you can tell, these attitudes and biases and thought processes are not very normal. In fact, I became quite depressed that at the age of 18, the last girl I ever knew who was a virgin lost it to some fucking prick who wooed her, had sex with her (from what I heard, not in the most compassionate way -- he basically just went at it), and dumped her within the space of two months. Whether this was out of compassion, feeling for what she'd lost by this, or whether I was actually just fucking jealous that every single person that I knew had had at least ONE sexual encounter, I have no idea and am scared to find out the answer.

It is thus that I come to the way I feel. Yes, I am sexually attracted to girls my age. I am NOT attracted to what 99.9999% of all girls my age ARE. In fact, I don't even want to associate myself with them. Even if I were to not completely loathe every one of the girls who were like that, they would soon find that I was completely unskilled in even how to talk to them, or where to go, or what to do, or anything like that, and they would move on to find someone who was able to roll with it where I was basically wanting her to teach me how to behave when dating or whatever, since I obviously don't have the innate ability to do so.

And even if you're not born with the ability to interface well with other people, (though some are better predisposed to it than others are), you still have to learn these things through social contact. I was never able to experience the greater amount of the social aspect of the years between being 11 in 7th grade and 15 in 11th grade. I just never got it. Thus the only way I can ever get it, to catch up to the years that I missed, (since I'm obviously not ready for social interaction at the adult level at this point in time), is to go back and immerse myself in groups of people with my social age. Unfortunately I'm 19 and the people with my social age are all 14 or 15.

And here I come to my dilemma. Since girls my own age are both completely out of my league or interest (and none of them would ever EVER consider me as a potential boyfriend), and I actually have more people in the 14-16 age bracket who like me than in my own age bracket, I have found that girls in that age are generally sweeter, more understanding of my situation, usually at my level in terms of their experience with the opposite sex, and don't have the problem where they feel they have to go out and drink and fuck random people every night.

Of course, even at the most optimistic of estimates, I am on speaking terms with two girls total, one of whom I haven't talked to in nearly a year and who I've heard is entering a relationship at this time, and the other is pretty much someone who I've found myself getting attracted to out of sheer necessity; even though everything about her sets off alarms. She subscribes to the gothic "subculture", listens to that fucking horrible "AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH" music, has cut herself, has many friends in the age group of 18-25, and considers school to be a place where she is oppressed by teachers who dislike her and students who shun her. Once, in November, we made plans to hang out (I'd like to mention at this time that this isn't some random girl I met in the Junior High playground. She has been good friends with my younger brother since they were both in 3rd grade, so we've known each other, though it's only recently that we've actually TALKED.) for a few days. Being the fucking pussy that I am, I was unable to call her house myself, having to ask my brother to do it for me; when we did meet up, I found myself starting to think about her in ways that I really didn't want to think about her (wanting to hug her every ten seconds, playfully poking her every once in a while, things like that) that I realized were my feeble attempts at subconsciously trying to flirt with this girl who was five years younger than me and a freshman in High School. I talk to her online fairly often, she says that she wants to spend more time with me (even if I say it first a lot of the time), and I've recognized that if I don't keep myself in check I might end up acting in a way that could get me into trouble -- trying to kiss her, urging her to cuddle, trying to hold her hand or something.

I have been worried for some time because I have thought of her sexually a few times, even though I don't think I would ever touch her (she's not stupid and told me that she knew all along how I was feeling and acting... she has been in relationships before so I realize that this is not who I want to set my attention to for a possible first girlfriend -- age barrier not withstanding)... I have therefore just started speaking to her less and less in an effort to wean myself from the only real female contact I have had for nearly a year.

So basically, this is where I stand. I've pretty much been forced into a situation where my only options for a relationship lie in girls who according to the law and the values of society are jailbait. Not only that-- but sexually, it's not the breasts, or the vagina, or other secondary or primary sexual characteristics that give me the most intense sexual stimulation: I have a foot fetish. Thus it's technically possible (and there have been instances in my life where this has happened) that sexually I am attracted to girls of any age, barring of course the obviously disgusting seven year olds. For Christ's sake, when I was 15 my brother's friend, a 10-year-old girl, slept over at the house a few times, and every time she was over I licked her feet while she was sleeping. Of course I also did it to my cousin who was the same age as me, at around the same point in time (said cousin three years later then got fucking pregnant and now lives in the fucking ghetto doing drugs -- the mother's side of the family is full of trash and losers, you British folk call them chavs I guess), and a few times while at friends' houses I have satisfied myself sexually with the feet of their sisters.

So basically I have the potential to be aroused by the feet of a twelve-year-old at this point right now, and if I had the chance I would probably act on it; wouldn't touch her sexually, that doesn't interest me much, if I did anything I'd probably ogle her feet and maybe touch them if she'd let me.

So now you get the idea of just how fucked up I am.

>>113

...what? That made no sense.

>>111-112 ........ wow just wow

wow, fucking internet

all i read was:
>>I'm sure that I would have paid much more attention to your arguments had you presented them in proper English.
>>So now you get the idea of just how fucked up I am.
EMO

Nobody's life is perfect.  Quit bitching.

You are not morally upright.  There is no such thing as being morally upright, as morals are completely subjective.

Stop concerning yourself with the lives of others, unless you are going to actually help them.

Stop expecting things to be given to you and start taking.

Accept yourself.  Understand that mainstream society will reject you for what you are, so you must accept youself. Understand that as long as you hurt no one, no one can decry you as evil.

>>111
>>112

ples to be givink Achmed ur name & address so he may blows you up teh good.
Congratulations, thanks solely to how utterly PATHETIC you are, I'm disassociating myself with peds forever. From now on I'm an Athiestic Catholic Bishop. That'll be the new wink-nudge codeword for the intellectual folks with megalomaniacal drive and ambition. gb2Bosnia emo whore. Ugh, and a foot fetishist too. You sicken the 'net with your sad sack self, dweebenheimer.

>>123

Are you in the right thread? :confused:

Uh edit in >>125
I think having a sexual attraction of teenage girls is normal. I myself once had when I was a teenager myself and still "abit" attracted to them (I find them too flat now). Younger than 12 then it goes all weird and that I cant understand why ppl like those that young. Anyways its ok but when you start oggling and raping them thats still wrong.

Pedophiles Anonymous

125 understands a bit. Sometimes, the old European ways are the best ways for some of us either do not or prefer not to move on. (note I did not say cannot as I believe this is both inborn and choice together. Little bit in one making you susceptible to the other.) Like, arranged marriages were always between pretty, or at the very least average girls. Only people that ran away from that had hotter servant girls on the side. Why could they not have the best of both worlds? Screw the church, do as I did in Medieval and TAKE IT OVER if it annoys you so much. Hahaha! Loli harems for all the princes of the world!

   Considering there's only like 5% of us or so who actively pursue such a thing, why can't some of you greedy selfish bastards make the necessary sacrifice? Why must you instead make with the hatred, which never solves anything, only drives it underground and makes it far more dangerous! Such confusion I am in over this sort of thing. It is like the law that gives longer sentences for statuatory than MURDER. Not that I would follow that, but many more desperate/violent ones do. To me they are like budding roses. You only clip the thorns of a lily white rose, you do not clip its stem. Only a sickly greedy man does such things, and he has many more problems in his head then, believe me. To those types, this is not a preference. It is purely a power trip, and those kinds of people are simply bad pears all around. Taking them by force bears the same fruit I believe, and shows a lack of caring or willpower.

This message (131/132) was suppose to be attached to >>111

nurupo

>>111-112

best world4ch posts so far
but you can still sink much deeper
keep it up, loser!

PS: promiscuous women are a good thing. helped me getting laid quite some times and none of them were bad persons

>>134

GA

OK I JUST WANT TO FUCK A LOLI, THATS ALL I WANT TO DO OKAY?
NOW STFU AND LEAVE US ALONE U STUPID FUCKING FAG

Too bad it's dead (the thread that is).

I eat babies.

Sound the trumpets and prepare for a glorious charge, who shall reach the goal first? A random straggler like me? A lolikon? A puritanical nitwit that can't keep his cock out of other people's bedrooms? A closet-case mixup of the above?
...Nah actually I hope a mod hits it and threadstops at the exact same time, that'd be proper pwnage on all you fuckheads.

hope a mod hits it and threadstops at the exact same time

You're an idiot because after >>1000get the thread automatically stops, it's been like that since 2ch first started in 1999

i think you were off >>149

>>148
fail at detecting sarcasm.

i love children

This thread is full of priests.

158 GET

kids like sex too
we should just have the kids have sex with eachother while pedos watch & fap, that way we have no abuse or whatnot going on two birds with one stone m i rite

i expect kids tobe inserted with gigantic dick which kids doesnt have.

Copy of B/ discussion

-people with lolita fetish are not HUMAN!
-Yotsuba's so fucking cute and sweet. ... some additional lovemaking, I'd stuff her in a bin bag. Three Weeks later, some playing children will find her mutilated and desecrated body in the forest. They will be scarred for life.
-What's the matter pussies, can't take the heat? Damn lolis, how can people be so sick right? Lolicon, pedophilia, all just too closely related to think about...too much for you is it? Aw poor guys.
-Lol you need to die. Enjoy your grave, fucking pervert.
-labelling someone a pervert?
what an intolerant society here, you can't accept another person's sexual preferences just because you yourself chose not to practice them?
-well at some point intolerance comes into play. its not like people are gonna cheer for rape
-this is /b/. there is irony in calling people on /b/ perverts.
-it just happens that the particular fetish in question (differing from mere drawings) usually involves someone who is unable to give consent, and therefore cannot be validated on the same plane as most fetishes or paraphilia.
-Alright, well, I rest pretty easily in the fact that like me, you'll have to die. At least I can take some kind of joy in that fact. People like you don't really deserve to live, as you take sexual pleasure from things which aren't meant to be sexually gratifying. Oh, but I don't question anything because I think it's wrong to lust over another sentient being who isn't properly developed enough to make responsible decisions.
-please die child rapists.
you are sick - that's all.
-You're just taking what you think is correct for granted, I'm not talking only about lolicon. And I may die, but the lolicon never will~ in any case, stfu <3
-omg liberal media feeds us "truth" that pedophilia is a psychological illness lawl

Copy of b discussion part 5
-This kind of hedonistic attitude is what starts wars anyhow. Like it's been said, when you hold no regard for others, they will hold no regard for you. By your own logic you deserve to die, many times, as there are people who are eager to kill you for your "happiness".
-yes, yes, that's exactly the kind of reaction I love to see from guro/lolicon/etc! Please do it again
-You're some fat fuck who masturbates to childpron.
You are not cool, rebelious, cynical or something else.
You are just fucking misserable.
-Maybe we should just lock up all selfish bastards willing to screw other humans over for their own pleasure (not survival) whethere it's sadistic murder or rape or deliberately making someone starve so you can wear more bling.

Copy of B discussion part 3 (yes the board ate it)

-Well, people are gonna believe whatever shit they want to, in the end. So those with similar morals might as well get together and just wipe out the anomalies, like the loli and guro fetishists already. No jail or anything, just a quick dispatch. Clean up the gene pool and make the species a little more orderly.
-And you can get idiots to believe that there's no such thing as a sexually interested or active pre-teen.
-If someone's gonna rape a kid, he's not gonna wait to read it in a manga first. Shouldn't blame these in my opinion, could actually have the opposite effect of what you say as statistics seem to support (not that statistics are accurate, but in any case).
-They'd come back. You can never elimnate "anamolies". Just be careful of who you put in charge or they might come killing anyone who engages in oral sex, handjobs, mutual masturbations, or likes sex for reasons other than procreation- citing it as "unnatural".
-Why must you fuckers think that sexually active means emotionally capable? Fucking teenagers for the most part aren't even emotionally capable for sex. They end up having it and then they get fucked up over it.
-child porn involves rape yes it should be banned as should any form of "glorified rape" (thats when the woman is shown to be enjoying it) because it encourages anti-social sexuality. rape is not the same as glorified rape, murder is not the same as glorified murder. Books that teach people to kill are illegal (the terrorist handbook with poison and explosive formulas) why not books that make rape seem like a nice thing!
If we can jail a politician for inciting a lynching (you don't have to follow his orders but some will!) then we should be able to jail a lolikon artist for inciting a rape in the minority of people who don't ever understand another way of having sex.
-Yeah everyone pretty much needs to die, but sometimes I get to thinking that maybe humans can create an equilibrium where there isn't much violence/instability, and that involves removing people who would think about having sex with children among others.
-and why exactly does child porn have to be rape?
-prepubescent not preteen dumbass
I was 10 and a half when I first had my period and started thing about sex...sure I wasn't ready for any sexual activity before 16 at least.
gah after all, does it matter how old the kid is? What counts most is consent or lack thereof.
-Because it's sex with an unconesnting individual you jackass. The fact of the matter is nobody wants to teach their children about sex, so they aren't informed. You don't like that? Well too bad, cuz the majority of people don't like you, and all it boils down to in the end is the will of the majority, so keep whining.
-Avergae loss of virginity is age 17. That means a good percentage lose it before and after that age. Teenagers are in general less emtionally mature than adults sure, but not every person below the age of your choosing is totally ignorant about their bodies, desires, and feelings, and not everyone above that age are perfectly aware of theirs.
Physical and emotional sexual maturity, if most of human society over the past couple thousand years is any indication- occurs between ages 14 and 18.
Again, I'm not saying that everyone should go out and start having sex as soon as they turn X years old, but that the age at which a person can engage in a healthy sexual relationships with no ill effects is generally younger than western judo-christian culture generally gives them credit for.
But very few (not even full grown women) appreciate the sexual advances of some random 30+ year old unattractive male stranger.
-True. Many child abuse victims don't understand what happened to them and think it is either natural to be hurt by adults or that they did something bad to deserve it.
Kids need to be taught what sex is, who is it for, how it works and how to recognize someone who is touching you where he/she is not allowed to. Children need to know that they can say 'no' if they don't want to be touched/have sex...and that anything that happen to them is not their fault.
-What I love about lolicon, guro, pedophilia, rape, is not whether it's arousing or not as much as the fact that it holds nothing sacred. I see it as a nice big FUCK YOU to all the fags who whine and bitch about anything they've been taught is wrong existing.
-It actually has little to do with judeo-christian culture, as judeo-christians used to get married at younger ages in the past as well. It has more to do with advancing society and the things you need to learn to be able to survive in the world and raise a family, which take many more years to cultivate; and before you're physically, emotionally and possibly financially capable for raising a family, sexual activity is not usually promoted. It is tolerated, but ideally since sex is a reproductive act it is encouraged to be held off until such a time.
-Oh, and also, fuck you for not being content to just live your own stupid life and having to retaliate at the people who believe they should hold morals, fuckwad hypocrite.
-so if somedbody comes over and cracks your skull open with a stone, since morals are "Lo2l"O!11 FOR FUCK LAMoRRzrZZR"!!!!" that's fine too?
Morals are the little thing that differs a human from an ape.
But fucking child molester scumm like you, who tries to act tough on the internet, probably is not willing to understand that.
-I'm all for freedom of speech but by definition "my freedom stops where yours starts". The rights to be a pedophile/rapist stop when they infringe on the right of a child/person to choose to have sex and live life unharmed.
I and many others here are fine with most deviancies: BDSM, coprophilia, age-difference etc as long as both (or more) parties are consenting.
A person who says no or a child who doesn't understand sex or want it is not a consenting partner.
As for animals, I really don't know.
Anyhow what counts is that many hentai guro and lolikon/shotacon depict rape as opposed to the fetishist stuff in which tops and bottoms come together in agreement to have sex in their own albeit strange ways.
It's not about natural/unnatural or religion: it's about consent and only about consent.
Making a non consensual act seem good or enjoyable to the victim is ...i hate to use the word... well wrong.

Vocabulary Note:

Person who has desires for prepubescent children = Pedophile
Person who acts upon and feeds those desires by watching child porn drawn or real, by stalking, by touching or molesting a child (includes incest) = Pedosexual
Child = human before puberty
Consent = agreement to partcipate and understanding of what they are consenting to.

There are cases of Pedophiles not wanting to harm any children and castrating themselves to get rid of their pedosexual desires.

The only differences between real child porn and lolikon (drawn child porn) are the fact that the former requires a real rape to happen and the latter can depict the child enjoying it.

I personally think that lolikon can lead on to child porn by feeding the unsatisfied pedosexual lusts... and as soon as child porn enters the equation then ethics immediately says it is 'wrong' because a child was tortured for a pedo to fap.

Can lolikon be defined as an incitement to rape by glorifying it? Should it be made illegal on the same level as child porn?
Technically someone looking at CP has done no harm as they did not hurt the child themselves... rather they supported the molester by viewing his acts and support an industry that does produce a small percentage of real life molesters. Can't this be said of lolikon too?

A few questions to the pedos who confirmed their sexual preference/deviancy on this board:
Would you ever hurt a child? Or would you rather be castrated than hurt a kid?
At what point (if ever) did you first recognise that pedophilia was rape?
Do you know of lolikons who moved on to real porn or pedophile roleplay (see projectmegan.com)?
Would you accept a law prohibiting lolikon media if it was proven that it would reduce the number of active pedosexuals?

I don't understand why people make political shit out of nature VS. nuture with sexuality.  They've proven that it can be inborn, with pedophilia and homos, but it being inborn has nothing to do with weather it's moral or not.  (gay penguins, gay dolphins, lesbian seagulls, look it up)

Infanticide is rampant among animals, and that's natural.  So why don't we kill our seven year olds and say "oh, it's natural, I'm just an infaticidist (or whatever).  You going to stomp on MY rights?  I CAN'T HELP IT!"

However, homosexuality is a completely victimless action.  It's not our right to decide what someone does with their dick or ass   (Or mouth, or eyesockets, or whatever your imagination can cook up).  But a 12 year old doesn't have the maturity to make that kind of decision.  So it's almost always rape, even if they "want" it.  Kids at that age sniff paint. 

>>173 Thats pretty gay.

Hah... Hahahahah...  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH..

Ever hear of Silo and Roy? Wendell and Cass?
http://www.jrn.columbia.edu/studentwork/cns/2002-06-10/591.asp
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi  <Paste the two lines together>
?f=/c/a/2004/02/07/MNG3N4RAV41.DTL

Some penguins go so far as to bring in a female, mate with her, make her lay an egg, drive her off and take care of it themselves. 

I'm afraid they have too much fucking compassion.

Or is that fucking passion?

It's not about intelligent discussion and emotional bonding.  It's about having a narrow pecker crammed into an undeveloped tiny hole.

yes i love lolis pussy

>>183

O__________________o;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

>>185

I hate pedos but geez, you're a fucking loser!

>>185
ืno, i hav 5 girls my age to choose but i dont. cuz im pedo

>> 186-189

hey fuck you guys, its not my fault i'm so ugly.

>>191

thats why i'm gay.

>>193

no u

Being attracted to prepubescent children is just as bad as homosexuality from a Darwinian PoV

Not really, because they grow up; unless you mean *only* attracted to prepubescents.

Guiness World Records says...!DAMN!
5 years old

>>199

You are a pedo

>>dodo
I haite you sir, with all the wretchedness in my heart. I hope your internet falls on your balls and crushes them in all their entirety